Factors affecting the adoption of modern fish farming technologies in Gokwe South District, Zimbabwe
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-2156.IntJSciRep20223371Keywords:
Aquaculture, Gokwe, Stakeholder, TechnologyAbstract
Background: Fish are a source of cheap protein to many rural communities in Zimbabwe. Unfortunately, very few fish farmers are not willing to adopt modern fish farming technologies in order to boost fish production. The study was carried out in order to establish the factors that are affecting fish farmers in adopting the modern fish farming technologies in Gokwe South District, Zimbabwe.
Methods: A household survey using a structured questionnaire was administered in February 2022.
Results: Sixty-four respondents participated in the survey and the majority (73%) were males. Most (47%) of the fish farmers were above 46 years. The common source of fish farming information was through non-governmental organizations (NGO) (40%) and through government departments (27%). The challenges affecting fish farmers in the area included financial constraints (40%), absence of markets (26%), lack of fishing equipment in local shops (13%) and the absence of fishing inputs and equipment in local shops (13%). Water shortage was the major (27%) factor affecting the adoption of modern technologies and this was followed by financial constraints (20%), political interference (20%), traditional and cultural beliefs (13%) and lack of knowledge (7%).
Conclusions: Modern fish farming technologies need to be fully embraced to raise both food and nutrition security particularly in rural communities. This can be achieved by the involvement of the government, traditional leaders, NGO and other stake holders in the provision of funds, training, monitoring and implementing of fishery projects in the area.
Metrics
References
Micha JC. Fish Farming in the Congo basin: Past, present and future. International Conference Nutrition and Food Production in the Congo Basin, Brussels. 2013.
Burnell G, Allan GL. New technologies in Aquaculture: Improving production efficiency, quality and environmental management. University College Cork. 2009.
Yue K. An overview of disruptive technologies for Aquaculture. James Cook University, Singapore Campus, Singapore. 2021.
FAO. Nigerias fisheries profile. 2020. Available at: www.faoorg/filfed en/NGA. Accessed on 2 Feb, 2020.
Martina MLV. Aquaculture Disruptive Technologies. Hydrology: Curr Res. 2021;12(8):360.
Anani FA, Nunoo FKE, Steiner-Asiedu M, Agbo NW, Nortey TNN. Production and use of farm made fish feeds by small scale pond fish farmers in Ghana. 2017. Available at: http://hdi.handle.net/123456789/805. Accessed on 2 Feb, 2020.
Garlock T, Asche F, Anderson J, Bjoorndal T, Kumar G, Lorrenzen K et al. The global blue revolution: Aquaculture growth across regions, species, and countries. Rev Fisheries Sci Agriculture. 2020;28:107-16.
Asche F. Farming the sea. Marine Resource Economics. 2008;23:507-27.
Dey MM, Kambewa P, Prein M, Jamu D, Paraguas F, Pemsl D, Briones R. Impact of the development and dissemination of integrated aquaculture-agriculture (IAA) technologies in Malawi. NAGA, WorldFish Center Quarterly. 2006;29(1-2):28-35.
Kumar G, Engle CR. Technological advances that led to growth of shrimp, salmon, and tilapia farming. Rev Fisheries Sci Aquaculture. 2016;24(2):136-52.
FAO. 2014. Available at: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/34/Midlands_districts.png/1024px-Midlands_districts.png?1656325661591. Accessed on 2 Feb, 2022.
Masvaya EN, Nyamangara J, Nyawasha RW and Zingore S. Effects of farmer management strategies on special variability of soil fertility and crop nutrient up take in contrasting agro-ecological zones in Zimbabwe. Dordrecht: Springer, Netherlands. 2010.
FAO. National Aquaculture Legislation Overview, M. Spreij,edt. India. National Aquaculture Legislation Overview (NALO) Fact Sheets. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department, Rome, Italy. 2005.
Zingore S, Murwira HK, Delve RJ and Giller KE. Influence of nutrient management strategies on variability of soil fertility, crop yields and nutrient balances on small holder farms in Zimbabwe. Agric ecosyst environ. 2007;119(1-2).
Gandiwa E, Mashapa C and Muboko N. Wild life and fisheries management in Zimbabwe: A critical reflection. Chinhoyi University of Technology. Chinhoyi. 2021.
Singh S, Masuku MB. Sampling Techniques and Determination of Sample Size in Applied Statistics Research: An Overview. Int J Econom Commerce Manag. 2014;2(11):1-22.
UNHLP. Leave no one behind a call to action for gender equality and women’s economic empowerment, Report of the UN Secretary-general’s High-level Panel on Women’s Economic Empowerment. 2016.
Unay-Gailhard I, Bojnec Š. Gender and the environmental concerns of young farmers: Do young women farmers make a difference on family farms? J Rural Studies. 2021;88:71-82.
Nampanzira DK, Kabasa JD, Nalule SA, Nakalembe I, Tabuti JRS. Characterization of the goat feeding system among rural small holder farmers in the semi-arid regions of Uganda. Springer. 2015;4:188.
Stoneman P. Technological diffusion: the viewpoint of economic theory. Pages 162–184 in P. Mathias and J. Davis, editors. Innovation and technology in Europe: from the eighteenth century to the present day. The Nature of Industrialization Series. Blackwell, Oxford and Cambridge, UK. 1991.
Ni J, Khazanchi D. Information Technology (IT) Investment Decisions Under Asymmetric Information: A Modified Rational Expectation Model. University of Nebraska at Omaha. 2009.
Swanepoel S. Department of Anthropology and Archaeology; Sociocultural Solutions to problems of Human Adaptation: Only study guide for APY2701. Pretoria: University of South Africa. 2010.