Personality characteristics and organizational commitment in Iranian employees
Background: Individual differences in personality can be a source of creativity and the root of many problems in organization. This study aimed to determine the relationship between organizational commitment and personality among staff in South Naft Company.
Methods: This research is descriptive and analytical study. The population study selected from nurses’ of Labbafi hospital according to the Morgan table. Finally 103 persons selected. In the present study data was collected by questionnaires. According the two variables used two standard questionnaires in this study. Questionnaire to measure personality traits “neo” which measures features of the character including mental ill, outward orientation, openness, consensus and commitment to taking knows. Organizational commitment questionnaire “Alain and Pierre” measure the three dimensions of emotional, rational and normative for analyzed using the software-SPSS version 19 software.
Results: There was a relationship between agreement personality and commitment to rational. Also, between externally personality with affective and normative commitment are positively related. Relationship does not exist between openness and commitment to the rational, emotional and normative. There is not relationship between neuroticism personality and affective normative and rational commitment.
Conclusion: There was a relationship between personality characteristics with the three dimensions of organizational commitment.
Keywords: Organizational commitment, Personality characteristics, Staffs
Allen M. Watkins. The relationship between communication, affect, job alternative, and voluntary turnover intentions. Southern Commun J. 1991;41(3):198-209.
Alnajjar A. The relationship between job satisfaction and organizational commitment among employees in the United Arab Emirates. J Appl Psychol. 1996;3(1):124-30.
Barrick M, Mount M. The big five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta-analysis. J Personal Psychol. 1991;44:1-26.
Chatman C, Orraily B. Organizational commitment. In: Chatman C, Orraily B, eds. Communications in Organization. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Williams & Wilkins; 1968: 925-971.
Esmith B. Correlation between personality and communications in nurse. J Soc Psychol. 2004;134:23-34.
Johns E. Job function and communications. J Organiz Behav. 2004;19(2):44-5.
Porter LW, Steers R, Mowday R, Boulian P. Organizational commitment, job satisfaction and turnover among psychiatric technicians. J Appl Psychol. 1974;59:603-9.
Hrrison JK, Hubbord Russel. Antecedents to organizational commitment among Mexican employees of a U.S. firming Mexico. Journal of social psychology. 1998; Oct;98:136.
Hughes LC, Chang Y, Mark BA. Quality and strength of patient safety climate on medical-surgical units. Health Care Manage Rev. 2009;34(1):19-28.
Krejcie RV, Morgan DW. Determining sample size for research activities. Educ Psychol Measure. 1970;30:607-10.
Allen N. Organizational commitment in the military: a discussion of theory and practice. Military Psychol. 2003;15:237-53.
Kark R. Shamir B, Chen G. The two faces of trans formational leadership: empowerment and dependency. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(2):255-96.
Leach LS. Nurse executive transformational leadership and organizational commitment. J Nurs Adm. 2005;32(2):228-37.
Luthans F. Extroversion persons. In: Hitt MA, Chet Miller C, Collela A, eds. Organizational Behavior. 2nd ed. Boston: McGraw Hill; 2008.
Mayer JP, Hrrscovitch L. Commitment in the workplace: toward a general model. Hum Resour Manage Rev. 2001;11(3):299-326.
Mayer RC, Shoorman DF. Differentiating antecedents of organizational commitment, a test of March & Simon model. J Organiz Behav. 2000;19(1):47-9.