DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-2156.IntJSciRep20170355

Scanning electron microscopy: a potential forensic tool to identify a piece of rhinoceros horn

Rina Rani Singh, Naresh Kumar Saini, Surendra Prakash Goyal

Abstract


Background: Illegal trade of rhinoceros horn in the global market has posed a serious threat to the long-term survival and the conservation of endangered one horn rhinoceros. Presence of fake horns imitating rhinoceros horn makes the situation graver. Thus, to curb the trade it is very important to scientifically identify the horns used in trade to support and strengthen the enforcement agencies. The presence of fake items makes the identification task much more difficult thus, a project entitled “Characterization of species from bone, tusk, rhino horn and antler to deal wildlife offence cases” was developed to identify rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis) horn in complete to pulverized form.

Methods: Various bio-scientific techniques like morphological, analytical and molecular were applied to identify the rhinoceros horn. Most of these techniques are promising in identifying rhinoceros horn in different forms. In present paper, we discuss on identification of a piece of rhinoceros horn using Scanning Electron Microscope and total nine horns were examined. The required micrographs were saved using software Digital Image Scanning System (DISS 5, Point Electronics, Germany). Scanned images for both rhinoceros horn from wild and zoo were similar. To find the specific signature, the micrographs of the rhinoceros horn were compared with buffalo and fake horns.  

Results: Differences were noted on both dorsal and ventral surfaces of rhinoceros horns examined under scanning electron microscope. On ventral surface numerous uniformly placed circular pores with mean diameter of 320 µm and had characteristic “sub pores within a pore”. Instead, in fake horn only few non-uniform pores were visible without any sub pores. The ventral portion of buffalo horn does not indicate presence of any such pores.

Conclusions: The characteristic “sub pores within a pore” signature of the ventral portion of rhinoceros horn has high potential for forensic identification and consequently, proving offences and convicting offenders. 


Keywords


Rhinoceros horn, Scanning electron microscopy, Forensic

Full Text:

PDF

References


Dinerstein E. The return of the unicornis. In: the natural history and conservation of the greater one-horned rhinoceros. New York: Columbia University Press; 2003.

Leader-Williams N. The World trade in Rhino horn: A review. Traffic International. 1992: 40.

Amin R, Bramer M, Emsile R. Intelligent data analysis for conservation: experiments with rhino horn fingerprint identification. Knowledge-Based Sys. 2003;16:329-36.

Foose TJ, van Strien N. Asian Rhinos. Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan. IUCN/SSC Asian Rhino Specialist Group. Switzerland: IUCN, Gland,; 1997

Khan BMK, Foose TJ. Chairman’s Report: Asian Rhino Specialist Group. Pachyderm. 1994;18:3-8.

Hanfee F. Wildlife Trade: A Handbook for Enforcement Staff. WWF-Tiger Conservation Program 1998: 56.

Ali S, Azfer MA, Bashamboo A, Mathur PK, Malik PK, Mathur VB et al. Characterization of a species-species repetitive DNA from a highly endangered wild animal, Rhinoceros unicornis, and assessment of genetic polymorphism by microsatellite associated sequence amplification (MASA). Gene. 1999;228:33-42.

Hsieh HM, Huang LH, Tsai LC, Kuo YC, Meng HH, Linacre A, Lee JCI. Species identification of rhinoceros horns using the cytochrome b gene. Forensic Sci Int. 2003;136:1-11.

Emslie RH, Brooks PM. African rhino. In: status survey and conservation action plan IUCN/SSC African Rhino Specialist Group. UK: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge; 1999.

Penny M. Rhinos: Endangered Species. London: Christopher Helm Publishers Limited;1987.

Martin EB, Vigne L, Allan C. On a knife’s edge: The rhinoceros horn trade in Yemen. Cambridge: Traffic International; 1997.

Sherriffs P. Black rhino released onto Zululand Rhino Reserve. Pachyderm. 2005;39:113.

Menon V. Rhino horn trade: Threats of rhino horn trade to the species in India. New Delhi. CBI Bulletin. 1996;4(2):29–33.

Mukherjee S, Sengupta S. Rhino poaching in Jaldapara Wildlife Sanctuary, North Bengal, India. Tiger paper. 1998;25(1):20-1.

Hay PP. Ethnopharmacology of rhinoceros horn. II: antipyretic effects of prescriptions containing rhinoceros horn or water buffalo horn. J Ethnopharmacol. 1991;33(1-2):45-50.

Block RJ. The composition of keratins: The amino acid composition of hair, wool, horn, and other eukeratins. J Biol Chem. 1939;127:181-6.

Hieronymus TL, Witmer LM, Ridgely RC. Structure of white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum) horn investigated by X-ray computed tomography and histology with implications for growth and external form. J Morpol. 2006;267:1172-6.

Kingdon J. East African mammals. Volume 3B. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1979

Hieronymus TL, Witmer LM. Rhinoceros horn attachment: anatomy and histology of a dermally influenced bone rugosity. J Morphol. 2004;260:298.

Ryder ML. Structure of rhinoceros horn. Nature. 1962;193:1199-201.

Lynch LJ, Robinson V, Anderson CA. A scanning electron microscope study of the morphology of rhinoceros horn. Aust J Biol Sci. 1973;26:395-9.

Lee-Thorp JA, van der Merwe NJ, Armstrong RA. Final Project Report ZA309: Source area determination of rhino horn by isotopic analysis. Unpublished WWF Report; 1992.

Hall-Martin AJ, van der Merwe NJ, Lee-Thorp JA, Armstrong RA, Mehl CH, Struben S, Tykot R. Determination of species and geographic origin of rhinoceros by isotopic analysis and its possible implication to trade controls. San Diego, California: Proceedings of an International Rhino Conference; 1993: 123-124.

Hart RJ, Tredoux M, Damarupurshad A. The characterization of rhino horn and elephant ivory using the technique of neuron activation analysis. South Africa: Final report on a project undertaken on behalf of the Department of Environmental Affairs; 1994.

Emslie RH, Brooks PM, Lee-Thorp JA, Jolles A, Smith W, Vermaas N. Development of a continental African rhino horn fingerprinting database and statistical models to determine the probable species and source of rhino horn. AFRSG rhino horn fingerprinting for security project 9F0084.1. Unpublished report to WWF; 2001.

Ashley MV, Melnick DJ, Western D. Conservation genetics of the black rhinoceros Diceros bicornis, I: evidence from the mt-DNA of three populations. Conserv Biol. 1990;1:71-7.

Swart MKJ, Ferguson JWH, Toit R du, Flamand JRB. Substantial genetic variation in the African black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis). J Heredity. 1994;85:261-6.

Tougard C, Delefosse T, Hanni C, Montgelard C. Phylogenetic relationship of the extant rhinoceros species (Rhinocerotidae, Perissodactyla) based on mitochondrial cytochrome b and 12 S rRNA genes. Mol Phylog Evol. 2001;19(1):34-44.

Swart MKJ, Ferguson JWH. Conservation implication of Genetic differentiation Southern African populations of black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis). Conservation Biol. 1997;11:79-83.

Wurster DH, Benirschke K. The chromosomes of the great Indian rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis L.). Experientia. 1968;24:5-11.

Hoesch RM, Steven RF. Species identification of mammalian horn by PCR. Ashland, Oregon, USA: National Fish and Wildlife Forensics Laboratory; 2004.

Nowell K, Chyi WWL, Pei KCJ. The horns of a dilemma: the market for rhino horn in Taiwan. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Traffic International; 1992: 44.

Groves CP. Species characters in rhinoceros horns. Zeitschrift fur Saugetierkunde. 1971;36:238-52.

Hsieh HM, Chiange HL, Tsai LC, Lai SY, Huang NE, Linacre A, et al. Cytochrome b gene for species identification of the conservation animals. Forensic Sci Int. 2001;122:7-18.